In relation to the GCR triangle, my formula for P nicely maps to 0 for the void at triangle centroid and ∞ for arbitrarily high potential complexity of situating your work in the universe. The boundary represented by the triangle maps to a threshold value of P. Call it P*.
Fun fact #3, the “breakthrough” idea here (for a poiesis-praxis parameter) is a neat leap into the triangle across the red edge.
-
-
For all you mysticism nerds, “enlightenment” is obviously at the exact center where time stops (pure aion), marked by thoughts like “that thou art” or “the rock has Buddha nature” just next to it. The exact center = non-thought.
Show this thread -
A logical thought curve will be continuous. An intuitive one will jump around. An “Aha!” will be a big discontinuous jump inward (more poiesis). An “UnAha!” (falsification) will be a big discontinuous jump outward. Here’s an old post on UnAha! experiences:https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2008/03/05/unaha/ …
Show this thread -
A theory-to-practice thought trail will be an arrow heading out. An example-to-generalization will head the other way. Triangle contours = consistent time perception. Going mad is a terminal inward spiral. Rejoining humanity from the depths of madness is an outward spiral.
Show this thread -
Anyhow, there you go. I may write this all up as a post, but if not this thread is it. This might interest
@fortelabsShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

