Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
vgr's profile
Venkatesh Rao
Venkatesh Rao
Venkatesh Rao
@vgr

Tweets

Venkatesh Rao

@vgr

Conversational account. For work follow @ribbonfarm, @breaking_smart, @artofgig. Tweets are 90% vacuous views, apathetically held. Mediocritopian. IKEA builder.

Los Angeles, CA
venkateshrao.com
Joined August 2007

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      I’ve been wondering why there are no “own the illibs” memes. Then it hit me: the main way any sort of liberal (big tent sense, including progressive and classical) “owns” illiberalism is simply not participating in it. Not “getting with the program.” Going idle if necessary.

      2 replies 3 retweets 28 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      It’s like saying “I’ll take the next one” when you don’t want to get on an elevator with some bunch of people. It is insulting to the degree there is room in the elevator. The biggest “own the illibs” move is simply not getting on the illiberal train. No matter how much they win.

      1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      The simplest and most powerful “weapon of the weak” is non-participation. It does more than rob the illiberal movement of energy and labor. It undermines it. That’s why they are desperate to “own” you in a rhetorical judo sense because they can’t actually own an unconsenting mind

      2 replies 3 retweets 12 likes
      Show this thread
      Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      The thing is, illiberal movements tend to be totalizing. There’s a promised land, everybody can and must go there, it will last forever, no need to go anywhere else after. To say “I’ll take the next one” is to belie the posture that this is the only one and the last one.

      6:37 PM - 16 Dec 2018
      • 1 Retweet
      • 12 Likes
      • Max Nighswander 🚀⏭🤖🐙 Jason Lee Byas ⚑ Ari Nielsen Stephen Brett Williams 🎙 Piyush Maverick Tainguriya Customer Support 🎙 Patrick Peter Borah Sidu Ponnappa
      1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Even ethnonationalism has a promised land all must go to. It’s called Back Home. Because the promised land is a planet where there’s a natural “ancestral” place for everyone and everybody is in their place. At least genocide isn’t plan A, so it’s marginally better than fascism.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        3. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          To the ones on elevator, it’s a threat because to them it’s not just one in an unending up-down circuit. It’s more like last boarding call on last ark of survival. To refuse to get on is to say “I don’t think there will be a flood”. Makes it hard/impossible for them to pretend

          1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
          Show this thread
        4. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Non-participation is so powerful it even works on *other* weapons of the weak, like strikes, boycotts, rioting. You may need to be stealthy about it, even lie, but it’s the most basic move. The zero of the political action number line. Labor can be forced, belief cannot.

          1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        5. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          But non-participation can only be used as a weapon to undermine totalizing ideologies, against which it is all-powerful. But there is a class of ideologies against which it is entirely ineffective: pluralistic ideologies.

          1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
          Show this thread
        6. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          A pluralist ideology is the opposite of totalitarian. If your ideology doesn’t require 100% local monopoly and can live with competitors so long as it has space and social energy for itself, non-participation is neither an insult nor a threat. It’s not an imperative to “own” you.

          1 reply 3 retweets 9 likes
          Show this thread
        7. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Communism failed precisely because capitalism is best defined primarily as non-participation in communism. It’s the scabspace. The ultimate scabs are not workers who break a picketting action, but consumers who don’t stop consuming out of solidarity with *particular* producers.

          1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes
          Show this thread
        8. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          The punchiest “own the libs” illiberal meme, NPC, almost tags their actual biggest threat: true non-players of the illiberal game. Not the ones who indulge in futile resistance posturing but the ones who simply don’t opt-in to the illiberalism du jour. “I’ll take the next one.”

          1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
          Show this thread
        9. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Non-participation is a tactic, not an ideology. Its meanings are context-dependent. When they want you to do X, you avoid it, make excuses, fake it, sandbag, drag feet, take a knee, reject job offers from presidents. When they want you to stop doing X, you continue stealthily.

          1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes
          Show this thread
        10. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Note: a lot of non-participation tactics are identified with labor movement, but that’s *coordinated, collective non-participation.* The underlying tactic is available to all individuals at all times, so is pre-ideological. Like Bartleby’s “I’d prefer not to,” but with a plan B.

          1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
          Show this thread
        11. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Totalizing, illiberal ideologies feed on growth and expansionary takeover of minds. They burn it all up and then they burn out. Because unlike pluralist ideologies (which are liberal by construction) they have no sustainable internal energy source.

          1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
          Show this thread
        12. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          They *have* to operate like MLM/ponzi schemes. Without new recruits there is only natural attrition and flame out. Then the next elevator comes along. And the next. And you can say, “I’ll take the next one” each time. Because here’s the thing: *you don’t have to take one at all*

          1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        13. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          I once read a quote (in Keller Easterling’s book Extrastatecraft, but can’t recall attribution) that “liberalism is not the sort of thing that has an essence.” Kinda. The essence of liberalism is non-participation optionality. Saying no. Waiting. To “take the next one” or stairs.

          1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        14. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Because pluralism (and all liberalism is pluralist) is fundamentally the belief that ideology is not in fact necessary for life. Life can go on, and sustainable energy for the psyche found, without going into the fold of a True Believer sheeple. Life without ideology is possible.

          1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes
          Show this thread
        15. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          As a result pluralist ideologies exclusively rely on opt-in temptations and reject the totalizing impulse. If they can’t get to self-sustaining critical mass, they adapt and evolve rather than turn to coercion. Minimum viable size for a pluralist ideology might be just 1 person.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        16. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Hell it can be less than 1 person. I’m capitalist on MWF, socialist on TuThu, traditionalist on Saturday, and ungoverned anarchist on Sunday. If I were more imaginative I’d have DIY substitutes for all 4. And they’d be all sub-singleton.

          2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        17. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Note that mere multiplicity of belief options and co-existence is not enough. It is necessary but not sufficient. What makes it pluralist and liberal is the opt-in factor, with no punitive consequences for opt-out. So intersectionality is neither liberal, nor pluralist.

          1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes
          Show this thread
        18. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          It is in fact isomorphic to right ethnonationalism. A place for everyone and everyone in their place. It’s just that promised land is not the static ancestral political geography of earth but a Standard Database Schema maintained by First Bureaucrats instead of First Ancestors.

          1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes
          Show this thread
        19. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          This is why illiberal criticisms of free markets from both left and right sound silly *in the same way*. They look for a totalizing coordination nerve center like their own to attack but cant find one. Tilting at “bankers” or “1%” is ultimately as futile as 9/11 was for Al Qaeda.

          1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        20. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Free markets are primarily free in a pluralist competition sense. All distortions coming from illiberalisms. And not only is totalizing presence NOT a goal for any one player, it is both ideologically rejected as bad (monopoly) and constraints generally accepted, even welcomed.

          1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
          Show this thread
        21. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Sure pluralism of any form, in a market form or some other structural form, has a critical flaw: tragedy of the commons. But here’s the thing: no totalizing ideology to date has been a better steward of any commons. They just sacralize it in words while defiling it in the dark.

          1 reply 4 retweets 9 likes
          Show this thread
        22. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 16 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          So: the most liberal thing you can do, for as long as it takes, is to simply find a way to keep existing and say “I’ll take the next one” no matter what the provocation, goading, mocking, or seduction. That’s the only own-the-illibs move you need. They’re on a clock. You’re not.

          4 replies 2 retweets 16 likes
          Show this thread
        23. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info