You have no obligation to be useful or interesting to the world.
-
-
Don’t you think using the natural world as a moral or behavioral paragon is sort of a slippery slope?
-
No, you’re thinking the naturalistic fallacy. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy … That’s only a slippery slope if you believe things have an “essential” nature. I don’t think they do. That’s why my example was a domestic indoor pet cat. Very far from “natural” catness.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Plants and your cat both don't have to work for their food. And I'm assuming your cat provides you some level of companionship (in trade for you feeding him?) therefore isn't your cat being useful?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.