Survival is never free, and especially not for the suicidal.
True, false, or not even wrong? When survival becomes easy, people with low interest in surviving live on. Asymptotic: when survival is free, the suicidal survive
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems a bit tautological as phrased. More practically what I consider cost of survival has been inversely proportional to suicides
-
The harder it is to survive the more people find it worthwhile to live on? That seems prima facie wrong. Suicide rates spike during economic and political crises
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No comprende amigo!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
close; when survival is subsidized, the suicidal survive
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True on both counts
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you’re suicidal, survival is not free, it is excruciatingly painfully/costly.
-
I mean materially
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's false for assuming only the poorest are suicidal. Plenty of people can afford to keep "surviving" and commit suicide anyway, whether survival is "easy" or "hard".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like we don’t know anyone who was seriously suicidal. I’m going with not even close enough to be wrong so far.
-
I do actually, but the more stereotypical kind you also appear to know. Trying to tag a different kind of subset than you are, driven by material factors. Middle-aged males in post-Soviet collapse, indebted farmers after a string of bad monsoons etc.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.