I’m pretty capitalist, but the idea that markets are the smartest large-scale entities we’ll ever invent is deeply depressing. This is why I’m always intrigued by *interesting* distortions. Not tawdry cronyist power grabs, but other kinds of weird unplanned distortions.
-
-
Still, out of every 100 ideas to do better than today’s market, if 99 are easier to hack than use, 1 is a genuine advance within or outside the ‘market’ paradigm. So I like the idea of an eternal arms race between markets and imaginative attempts to distort them.
Show this thread -
You’ll always end up with one of 3 things: A new kind of criminal (99%) A new kind of market (0.9%) Something smarter than a market (0.1%)
Show this thread -
Dumb view: both markets and distortions are eternal patterns. Free-market fundamentalist view: markets evolve, distortions don’t Reactionary view (both left and right): markets are static but my new kind of distortion will deliver utopia Ze Truth: Arms race. Both evolve.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.




