etiquette is also this
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Protections for me, but not for thee!pic.twitter.com/L3HR1bkd4K
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is another version of the ‘there is no objective truth’ brigade. I’m right because I think so and you’re right because you think so and we’re both ‘right’ to think that.
-
strawman
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
yes, i'm sure the lives of the powerless would be a lot more pleasant without social norms that dampen how nasty people are to each other. the net direction of abandoning civility would without a doubt work in their favor. especially low wage service workers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Or this is right and you have a rosy-eyed view of what "shared" means when power is in the picture. Kevin's article is great and your reference to it makes no sense. Personhood is orthogonal here. Power *is* the ability to decide whose personhood gets prioritized.
End of conversation
-
-
-
These norms protect the powerful, but they also protect the rest of us from a war of all against all, in which politics starts to involve more and more social violence and disagreements are seen as deep affronts. Civility and decorum help preserve a healthy marketplace of ideas.
-
I think it’s hard to preserve a liberal ethos if there aren’t norms that engender respect for political debate and disagreement. Otherwise, hey, burn the witch!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why would we try to spare the sensitivities of the kulaks, lmao
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.