20 years ago we understood computers & internet pretty well, and basic social science hasn't changed much since then. Yet we mostly failed to predict the rise of social media. So what exactly did we get wrong then; what exactly have we learned the we didn't know then?
-
-
Okay, but new social media differs in systematic ways. How can we best understand those ways in terms of what it is we've learned?
-
It's easier to run a centralized system than a decentralized one (Facebook vs Usenet). Usability matters for getting normal people on board (FB v Blogs). People value their money more than their privacy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly! The problem with organic OG social media was that there was no "there" there. Real water becomes invisible to us fishes. New Social Media platforms are fish farms. There is very much a There there, and it uses the lure of virality as a lottery for faux social credit.
-
Could you elaborate?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Pretty sure I was reading Slashdot regularly 20 years ago :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.