Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
vgr's profile
Venkatesh Rao
Venkatesh Rao
Venkatesh Rao
@vgr

Tweets

Venkatesh Rao

@vgr

Conversational account. For work follow @ribbonfarm, @breaking_smart, @artofgig. Tweets are 90% vacuous views, apathetically held. Mediocritopian. IKEA builder.

Los Angeles, CA
venkateshrao.com
Joined August 2007

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
    • Report Tweet
    • Report NetzDG Violation

    A thread on cultivating an ‘unexpected bonus’ attitude to work that catalyzes actionable insights, discoveries, inventions, and spillover societal value. Interestingly enough, the trick to this lies in a dilemma within the mundane, everyday problem of valuing effort for pay.

    2:25 PM - 4 Nov 2018
    • 23 Retweets
    • 72 Likes
    • Alan Martin Chris Clark 🎙 Piyush Maverick Tainguriya Customer Support 🎙 David Holt David Reinecke 🇿🇦 Matt Guttman karan⚡️ Tom Chandler Rahul Ramchandani
    6 replies 23 retweets 72 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        Whether you make money on a salaried, hourly, project-based, or outcome basis, people generally don’t want to pay for either effort OR output. They want to pay for *apparent effort visible in output, with 20/20 hindsight, with no obvious lower-effort paths than the one taken.*

        2 replies 6 retweets 41 likes
        Show this thread
      3. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        Nerdy point: This is ex-post modal rationality: it’s like conducting a Vickrey (2nd-price) auction of counterfactuals. Whoever did work “wins” but is paid bid price of the fictitious second-price producer who *could* have done it cheaper with benefit of hindsight shorter path.

        1 reply 3 retweets 21 likes
        Show this thread
      4. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        So unexpected elegance in output can end up devaluing the effort that went into creating it. 20/20 hindsight represents a *risk* in creative work that leads to imagination inhibition. And no you can’t prescope discovery: “I will stumble on 2 insights while coding this feature”

        2 replies 4 retweets 24 likes
        Show this thread
      5. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        This means things that take a complex path to get to but can be vastly simplified with hindsight insights once you’re there — the essence of art+science beyond craft — are systematically undervalued. This is the reason for a lot of obscurantism in presenting the output of work.

        1 reply 5 retweets 28 likes
        Show this thread
      6. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        The maker’s dilemma: if you DON’T make the obvious simplifications apparent with hindsight, the customer might spot them in the output and think you’re stupid. If you DO make them, they’ll assume you put in less effort than you did, based on the apparent visible effort.

        1 reply 3 retweets 21 likes
        Show this thread
      7. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        This dilemma is inherent in all types of information work, but especially kinds where there are ‘unreasonable effectiveness/elegance mechanisms’ like math, algorithmic structure, or laws of physics. Hidden “nature’s gift processes” entangled with the work processes.

        1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes
        Show this thread
      8. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        Sometimes the dilemma is avoided by the essential insight being so non-obvious, you can act on it and reasonably make the case that you couldn’t have anticipated it. But this is often much harder to do than people think. Insights have a bad habit of appearing obvious ex-post.

        1 reply 2 retweets 15 likes
        Show this thread
      9. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        3 ways to mitigate, 2 bad, 1 good: a) Obfuscate potential simplifications and deliver needlessly complex output 😖 b) Obfuscate elegant output so apparent effort equals actual effort 🤮 c) Parlay elegance from hindsight simplification of original work into BONUS output 😎

        1 reply 3 retweets 20 likes
        Show this thread
      10. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        A bonus is low-marginal-effort/high-marginal-value unexpected extra output that cashes out discovered elegance in a solution to a problem via speculative scope expansion. You basically create & pick low-hanging fruit people didn’t think was within reach, and weren’t aiming for

        1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes
        Show this thread
      11. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        It is exceeding expectations but not to demonstrate a superhuman work ethic. Instead it is exceeding expectations as a consequence of unexpected discovery. You’re saying, “this turned out to be more delightfully elegant than we thought when scoping, here’s a cherry on top!”

        1 reply 1 retweet 15 likes
        Show this thread
      12. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        Your own expectations of effort/reward ratio were pleasantly violated and you’re capturing and passing on some of the excess reward. As a result, total apparent effort equals total actual effort but everybody gets more value than they expected, with no dumb obfuscation.

        1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes
        Show this thread
      13. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        For this to happen, a bonus needs to feel like a good gift. Something that expands minds by showcasing the abundance you’ve stumbled across. It should address a subconscious want that’s outside the plan, rather than a conscious need that’s within it. Not 20% more; 20% different.

        2 replies 0 retweets 15 likes
        Show this thread
      14. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        The thing about discovered elegance (ie potential for hindsight simplification in the output of complex effort) is that it’s not necessarily “efficiency” in the sense of achieving a goal with less resources, gaining “savings”. You’ve already sunk inelegant effort. So what to do?

        1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
        Show this thread
      15. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        If you’re on an iterative learning curve, maybe future instances of effort can be cheaper. For example, in doing a manual analysis, you spot an elegant algorithm for automating it that makes future instances much cheaper and faster. That’s close-ended learning. Lean learning.

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        Show this thread
      16. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        But discovered elegance is rarely that limited. Nature rarely hands you “lean” gifts that can only be used to make the next instance cheaper. Nature is not a “25% off next purchase” coupon gifter. Nature’s gifts have unexpected “fat” spillover potential, like a cashback.

        1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
        Show this thread
      17. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        But to actually claim the gift, you have to open up the scope of what you’re doing. You have a hammer in your hand you didn’t expect to have. You must look around for nails you didn’t know were hammerable. If you don’t, and only look within existing scope, you will likely *lose*.

        1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes
        Show this thread
      18. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        The hammer in this metaphor can be thought of as discovered IP. Depending on the nature of the work context, you may have some claim on the IP itself (for example my former employer Xerox had a mechanism to assign IP it had no use for back to inventor employees).

        1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes
        Show this thread
      19. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        If for example, you invent a better mousetrap while employed at Mousetraps, Inc. you may lose some pay for sunk effort (it looks like a day’s work, actually took a week) but get a patent bonus, and maybe rights for non-mousetrapping applications. But these are side issues.

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        Show this thread
      20. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        The deeper point here is developing a bonus/spillover ‘lucky’ mentality and actively looking for elegance in everything you do. Even at the risk of lower immediate reward due to maker’s dilemma. In the short run, in specific gigs, you may lose rewards.

        1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes
        Show this thread
      21. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        But in the long run, you’ll develop a reputation for being unreasonably lucky and inspired. A “done, and gets things smart” genius rather than a mere “smart, and gets things done” worker-bee. See Steve Yegge post on this: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/06/done-and-gets-things-smart.html …

        1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes
        Show this thread
      22. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        A bonus mentality is also the trick behind “talent hits what others can’t hit, genius hits what others can’t see”, can you guess why? It has to do with “obviousness” in where you’ve come from versus in where you could go.

        1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes
        Show this thread
      23. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        If an “obvious” insight at line 800/week 3 of coding V1 of a program leads you to actually deliver a 20-line V2 that takes 1 hour to write, your client will feel cheated if you charge more than a day. But the 3 weeks are not waste, they’ve refactored your perception!

        1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes
        Show this thread
      24. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        The client is the beneficiary of a more cheaply hammered nail, but you’re the one with the new hammer, capable of seeing the nails others can’t see. They will... after you point them out, and hammer a few bonus nails to teach them.

        1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes
        Show this thread
      25. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr 4 Nov 2018
        • Report Tweet
        • Report NetzDG Violation

        Those bonus nails are how you capture more value from your insights AND ensure everybody groks the potential so it’s turned into spillover societal value. That is the big prize. So don’t let the maker’s dilemma in creative work inhibit your openness to discovery. Carpe diem!pic.twitter.com/DfaE6Mr5Uz

        0 replies 1 retweet 17 likes
        Show this thread
      26. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2020 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
      • Cookies
      • Ads info