Most of the ideas & practices that circulate around us are unverified. I shared an article on Facebook on how food sensitivities testing is fraudulent & has no scientific basis. The reply of a friend: "it worked for me." Thus it will always be.
-
-
This case was worse than that. The scientists say, the presence of an IG means you ate a food. The naturopaths say, the presence of an IG means you are sensitive to a food.
-
So, the meaning of the IGs is kind of being falsified. I suppose charitably you could say it is being interpreted differently. But isn't that what we are always arguing about: interpretation?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.