Btw the center of gravity of the problem is developing world to developing world (eg Myanmar-> Bangladesh), where most refugee flows already happen, not developing to developed, which should happen more, but is unlikely to. So IoM should be designed for developing-to-developing.
This is a really bad idea. It assumes that states and native residents of them have intrinsic value that requires no justification, but people coming from elsewhere do. Either look at mutual value any of the 3 provide to each other or none.
-
-
In Ancapia, natives should be evaluated that way too, and most people would actually have good measurements. It's accounting for the value of the infrastructure put in place.
-
Can't do that without implicitly justifying the violence required to put the infrastructure in place. In general, this kinda of utilitarianism leads to infinite regress and the value of everything becomes ambiguous/ill posed.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.