"Migrant" didn't exist as a category until modernity. Before that you had refugees, invaders, slaves, and merchants/sailors (not counting nomads). In the 1300s there were 2 people who didn't fit those special categories (Ibn Batuta, Petrarch,...). Now: 244m, 3% of world.
Conversation
If migrants were a country, they'd be the 5th largest in the world. This is a hilariously disenfranchised group.
Humanity has put itself into a nativist zugzwang since Westphalia: you move you lose. Instant demotion from human to subhuman.
2
12
45
Thought experiment: what would it take to organize migrants into a sort of virtual second-order nation? You prove you've lived/worked in 2+ countries, you get a "Globalist" passport that gets you some sort of recognition and privileges in the interstices of world. Like seasteads.
3
5
28
Do migrants as a class have any sort of collective action leverage against nations/nativists? You can't work within the vote-based representation system since most don't have voting rights. But could you, for instance, call a global migrant "strike" for example? (answer: no)
1
2
11
This is going to be an increasingly critical problem as climate change drives up more migration, and more people enter relationships that create families spanning continents.
1
2
9
It is interesting that 'non-state actor' and 'stateless actor' are basically synonyms for 'terrorist'. That's the starting perception you're working out of in terms of constructing legal personhood on this planet you cannot leave.
Replying to
Ironically, "migrant" is probably the only identity that evokes anything comparable to a sentiment like "nationalism" for me. Having crossed a significant border (or being born to someone who has) is a serious bond with others who've done the same, regardless of race etc.
3
4
20
Replying to
Yeah familiar with those, though I haven't yet read them. The extrapolated arguments from Seeing Like a State are obvious.
1
1
Show replies

