what kinda trap you setting here?
you know better than I do that this varies sooooo much depending on scale, scope, starting niche... the bigger the userbase gets the more you have to anticipate evil+smart users.
100–10,000 users: smart+good
100,000: dumb+good, dumb+evil
1m+
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
depends on project constraints
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
eh.. feels like a fake decision. Would design for D&G AND S&E. If just the former you have glaring security holes. If just the latter you limit usability.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
obviously depends on the product, but there is generally better payoff on the ones designed for a dumb and good majority
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm outlier-ing this one, if you design for smart and good then the median will be...the median and you'll settle on the bell end
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dumb and good. Good because most people are good. Dumb because people are often distracted. "Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking of them." -- Whitehead
-
Dumb & Good: little oversight, easy flows. Consumer apps. Dumb & Evil: heavy oversight, easy flows. Databases for classified intel. Smart & Good: little oversight, high agency. Programming languages, libraries. Smart & Evil: heavy oversight, high agency. Trading-floor software
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

