3. It is really good at finding the lowest-energy response to a situation (sounds like a joke, but it is a highly adaptive trait. Energy reserves are more valuable than almost any specific action you can take with them) 4. It is very good at anomaly sensing ('something is off')
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Problem is some of the latest research now indicates we get a dopamine hit when we solve problems - combine that with our 'energy conservation' and we appear to be double-biased to reach solutions or conclusions - awareness of these aspects is the only countermeasure we have
-
This is not a self-evidently bad thing. In general reaching some solution/conclusion is better than remaining in doubt, because then behavior is triggered which will falsify.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
On the fly calculations that must take in to consideration of soil composition, pole height, wire strain, and overcompensation to plumb an existing leaning pole. It’s nothing that I think about, I can just do it with very good accuracy. I would hate to see the math on this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is a methodological issue. What do you compare a judgement with? For accuracy you need an objective criterion, which is rare in the social world. To detect bias you just need a judgement difference between two groups without caring about what an accurate judgement would be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.