Conversation
Why must you C.Alex everything 😐
Paradigm lock
1
4
it’s not “everything” it’s literally his independent aesthetic conclusion
1
2
Yeah yeah
Fun fact: car companies have design people specifically focused on making sure doors close with a satisfying thunk
I bet there’s product design literature on this. I suspect there’s a strong aural component. It’s a kind of anti-music, like anti-jokes.
2
6
why anti-music? a satisfying sound is more music than noise
2
2
There’s no tension-resolution thing going on. It’s just straight up resolution. Like anti jokes aren’t incoherent or unfunny, they just don’t set up and resolve a premise. But I’m not attached to the idea. Just seems to fall short of musicality.
1
2
I’d summarize it as something like “reading mind in the revelation of precise fit”
1
2
The design examples have precision of fit going on but the soap and other found-ritual examples seem to have significant messiness and imprecision
In fact we might have here a perfect challenge for you: the oddly satisfying mess. Extra credit: involving mild destruction
3
3
I think oddly satisfying destruction tends to be about revealing organization (put there by minds??) that was present but invisible
2
2
Replying to
That leaves the messiness part. Many examples from the account seem to involve some messiness. In the soap case, the shaving process decoheres after a few shaves as dice rain gives way to awkward peels


