Why??? twitter.com/cuttingvids/st
Conversation
Replying to
that’s interesting - I’ve never read a good explanation of the “satisfyingness” quale (a visual that’s inexplicably satisfying to see)
3
8
Replying to
2
3
Why must you C.Alex everything 😐
Paradigm lock
1
4
it’s not “everything” it’s literally his independent aesthetic conclusion
1
2
Yeah yeah
Fun fact: car companies have design people specifically focused on making sure doors close with a satisfying thunk
I bet there’s product design literature on this. I suspect there’s a strong aural component. It’s a kind of anti-music, like anti-jokes.
2
6
why anti-music? a satisfying sound is more music than noise
2
2
There’s no tension-resolution thing going on. It’s just straight up resolution. Like anti jokes aren’t incoherent or unfunny, they just don’t set up and resolve a premise. But I’m not attached to the idea. Just seems to fall short of musicality.
1
2
I’d summarize it as something like “reading mind in the revelation of precise fit”
1
2
The design examples have precision of fit going on but the soap and other found-ritual examples seem to have significant messiness and imprecision
In fact we might have here a perfect challenge for you: the oddly satisfying mess. Extra credit: involving mild destruction
The Taken movies and John Wick movies are oddly satisfying precisely because there is no real outcome tension. The protagonists are robotic Terminator-like characters who signal early on they are going to win with machine like determinacy. Many B-movies are like this.
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more


