When white female feminists specify ‘white male’ over just ‘male’ in a criticism, what’s the idea?
a) WMs are the main problem
b) Being W is a problem for the Ms but not the Fs being critical
c) Non-W Ms are not a structural problem because WFs outrank them socially
d) ?
Conversation
Replying to
I’m also amused to note: this post is borderline troll-inciting given the endless opportunities for misunderstanding, both accidental and willful, that can arise from a thread like this. Let’s see what happens.
1
7
Replying to
D White women don't want to be seen reading non-W men the riot act, but would be happy to if allowed.
(fwiw, my wife who cares not a whit, has bone to pick w Hispanic construction guys, she says black or white Construction guys are Clark Gable by comparison)
Replying to
a & c and they usually write and enforce the laws, hold public offices, fund things, etc
1
2
Replying to
W and M are intersecting privileges that rarely work in isolation but are difficult to disaggregate
1
Replying to
It’s essentially done for the same motivation as when someone identifies a journalist, politician, financier or professor who has said or done “X” as Jewish
2
Replying to
I think c will explain most cases I can think of, and I also think it's closest to being true between a, b, and c.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more








