One reason I avoid making up frameworks and methodologies (besides hypocrisy of doing that as a thoroughly undisciplined person) is that even when good, they are fragile to mediocre, half-assed execution.
-
-
A fragile methodology goes negative expected value when half-asset. A good robust one allows an 80-20 triage use (20% fractional-assery provides 80% of value) A mediocre robust one has positive-semidefinite utility with fractional assery (harmless at worst)
Show this thread -
To the extent there are implied “systems” in anything I write, they are mediocre-robust-with-lulz. As in, they do no harm, and provide lulz for onlookers if applied with less than fully engaged thoughtfulness.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.