Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
Nah. The point isn’t to think or analyze in a system 2 sene. That’s a different problem. The point is to create a competing system 1 analogy. Analogies ARE thinking. You just prefer other kinds and are possibly an Elon Musk fan 🙂
1
1
If he means literally (and tautologically) means cohesion as in “like particles sticking together”, then the way you do that with diversity is to create *new* shared likeness the way armies/schools/evangelical religions do...
1
1
...He’s actually deliberately conflating cohesiveness with strength, exploiting heuristics. If you address strength directly, there are better direct pathways using adhesive bonding (among unlike particles) that actually create better strengths.
1
2
Replying to and
"Diversity of opinion and values" is not what Tucker is dogwhistling about. Those are mutable through conditioning so a different topic compared to ethnicity, race, religion/class of birth, and all the other things you can't change that serves as homogeneity-construction fodder,
1
1
Show replies