Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
Nah. The point isn’t to think or analyze in a system 2 sene. That’s a different problem. The point is to create a competing system 1 analogy. Analogies ARE thinking. You just prefer other kinds and are possibly an Elon Musk fan 🙂
1
1
...He’s actually deliberately conflating cohesiveness with strength, exploiting heuristics. If you address strength directly, there are better direct pathways using adhesive bonding (among unlike particles) that actually create better strengths.
1
2
...and finally note that he’s picking out attributes of similarity he wants to *construct* homogeneity out of (race and religion) and sweeping diversity variables within his audience (class and income in particular) unhelpful to his intent under the rug. Answers his own Q.
1
2
Show replies