Nah. The point isn’t to think or analyze in a system 2 sene. That’s a different problem. The point is to create a competing system 1 analogy.
Analogies ARE thinking. You just prefer other kinds and are possibly an Elon Musk fan 
-
-
If he means literally (and tautologically) means cohesion as in “like particles sticking together”, then the way you do that with diversity is to create *new* shared likeness the way armies/schools/evangelical religions do...
-
...He’s actually deliberately conflating cohesiveness with strength, exploiting heuristics. If you address strength directly, there are better direct pathways using adhesive bonding (among unlike particles) that actually create better strengths.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.