If Andy Warhol was right that "in the future, everybody will be famous for fifteen minutes," it follows that in the further future, everybody will want to endlessly re-live their fifteen minutes of fame.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The question is probably whether we are nostalgic for a nonexistent past or for a nonexistent future.
-
Why is that an "or" question?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s complicated when certain elements and ideas in the past appear to have been more forward-looking than the present. Also related: questioning whether or not time is necessarily a forward progression.
-
It feel like spiralling tree of sorts
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i was going to deny this, but i read it in the past and i'm reacting to it now, so real nice ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Been saying this forever. Gets all the good winces.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe it's just we idolize our childhood
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's not what 'reactionary' means. identifying with elements of the past is natural. that's not the same as trying to roll back social and moral progress because you consciously identify with a pre-progress situation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.