Most philosophy seems to be centered on one of 2 things: survival or self-actualization. Almost all non-religious philosophy is centered on the latter. Darwinism (as a philosophy) and existentialism are the only major philosophies of survival that I can think of. Any others?
-
-
Replying to @vgr
Seems broadly untrue, unless epistemology, ontology, metaphysics, ethics, etc. are all actually/secretly about self-actualization?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @simpolism
Yup, they are, and it's not "secret" -- it is all concerned with the nature of being and its flourishing/generativity. The question of being vs. non-being is in a way too elemental to theorize a lot. You kinda have to contemplate it and stick to simpler pre-theory.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Are there not other, more practical reasons why one might be interested in investigating the nature of being? Like, coming up with cool product ideas, or winning debates?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simpolism
You realize that requires assuming and embracing being over non-being? Except during wartime, most people don't realize there are assumptions being made in that department.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Isn't the idea of "embracing being over non-being" itself a dichotomy advanced by existentialism (a wartime philosophy)? Is it not self-evident to most that being is preferred over non-being? Perhaps we need philosophy to help those for whom it isn't obvious.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Venkatesh Rao
Venkatesh Rao added,
-
-
Replying to @vgr
The question doesn't make sense to me, some assumptions baked in that aren't clicking. I don't understand what it means to "choose death", unless Camus meant self-defenestration.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.