Conversation

iirc the long-term explanation of wildfires is that building human habitations too close to natural fire zones leads to over-aggressive control of small fires leading to underbrush build up over years and bigger fires. Is this roughly correct?
Replying to
Pretty much what I remember reading about this issue before "muh climate" became the default explanation for literally anything that happens on, or under, the unpaved parts of the Earth's surface.
1
1
Replying to
Climate definitely contributes as longer hot/dry spells exacerbate the situation. Climate change in general is like stress in the human body. It increases the probability of certain kinds of extreme scenario.
1
2
Show replies
Show replies
Replying to
Kinda like an inversion of anti-fragility no? Antifragility assumes constant corrections to a system to make it more resilient over time. This is helicopter parenting equivalent of enviro stewardship leading to net fragility.
1
3
Replying to
Yeah, interesting thought to tease out there. The suppression of smaller fires doesn't induce hormesis but actually compromises defenses at higher doses.
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
Cali has a 10 year drought that led to millions of dead trees - that's their biggest problem... Unusually hot & dry make the problem worse
Replying to
Partially; fire suppression policies and limits on logging/thinning (some good, some with unintended consequences) and mismanagement of grassland ecosystems are big factors in less populated areas
5