The miasma/lungs theory that was used to justify the Olmsted parks movement was discredited even before most of them were built. What’s the best second line of defense justifying *keeping* the parks now that they’re built? Why *shouldn’t* they be razed in favor of housing etc?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.