Type P people are only creative when they’re unconsciously convinced what they are doing is significant+important.
Type Q people are only creative when they’re unconsciously convinced what they’re doing is insignificant+unimportant.
I’m type Q
P/Q because A/B is taken.
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
this is probably more template than statement. I feel like 'creative' here implies 'creation' vs consumption as something un-productive that's more for our own sake in either zonepic.twitter.com/ckNVpbCyvQ
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @letkma
No this makes no sense. P-Q can’t be orthogonal to O-R. The coherent solution is P | R —— O| Q Axes labels and limits needed
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
I ran into that when making it: "regardless of position" doesn't really fit perpendicular to the P Q axis that describe position, even if you shift it 45 degrees. I've changed my wording a bit to cheese it, but perhaps we're all not quite there yet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That’s interesting sounds like the shuhari spectrum https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuhari
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
In English it’s often translated into a 4-stage sequence: Unconscious incompetence Conscious incompetence Conscious competence Unconscious competence I think that’s OQPR
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think I find OQPR more solid than OPQR but it’s probably not linear there. The 2 alt sequences likely reflect different personalities.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.