Type P people are only creative when they’re unconsciously convinced what they are doing is significant+important.
Type Q people are only creative when they’re unconsciously convinced what they’re doing is insignificant+unimportant.
I’m type Q
P/Q because A/B is taken.
No this makes no sense. P-Q can’t be orthogonal to O-R. The coherent solution is P | R —— O| Q Axes labels and limits needed
-
-
I ran into that when making it: "regardless of position" doesn't really fit perpendicular to the P Q axis that describe position, even if you shift it 45 degrees. I've changed my wording a bit to cheese it, but perhaps we're all not quite there yet
-
Yeah, not yet solved. I’m leaving it open.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
y axis = peak performers x axis = trough performers increase in either = frequency
-
This might work. Does/does not perform in peak/trough Now only need ST: TNG mapping’s for R and O. R = Riker doesn’t quite work does it? O=?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.