The reason I don’t really care about climate skeptics is that I don’t need to believe they’re 100% wrong or that I’m 100% right to want to help undertake meaningful climate action. Pascal’s wager thinking applies. Even a 10% chance climate scientists are right is enoughto act on
You don’t. That’s a feature not a bug, you to bound certain downsides but everywhere else you *want* surprises.
-
-
Unpredictability of new tech is cool. But I meant to refer to an unpredictability of there being a new tech frontier. Would your answer be different? Maybe a conservationist point could be made to not rely on the randomness of tech leaps (although I'm not sure I hold that view)
-
Key is to marry infinite game like explorimentation with empathy optics...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.