The reason I don’t really care about climate skeptics is that I don’t need to believe they’re 100% wrong or that I’m 100% right to want to help undertake meaningful climate action. Pascal’s wager thinking applies. Even a 10% chance climate scientists are right is enoughto act on
-
-
Then you should know that Pascal's wager reasoning is one of the most debunked and invalid forms of reasoning. Don't make bad arguments for good policies. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal-wager/ …
-
But you could argue the status quo is totally insane - what justifies that?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.