The reason I don’t really care about climate skeptics is that I don’t need to believe they’re 100% wrong or that I’m 100% right to want to help undertake meaningful climate action. Pascal’s wager thinking applies. Even a 10% chance climate scientists are right is enoughto act on
Conversation
Replying to
By Pascal's wager thinking you mean expected value thinking :). Pascal's wager is not a good form of argument - you can justify totally insane things
1
Replying to
Then you should know that Pascal's wager reasoning is one of the most debunked and invalid forms of reasoning. Don't make bad arguments for good policies. plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal
1
2

