The reason I don’t really care about climate skeptics is that I don’t need to believe they’re 100% wrong or that I’m 100% right to want to help undertake meaningful climate action. Pascal’s wager thinking applies. Even a 10% chance climate scientists are right is enoughto act on
-
-
But perhaps the most important reason is that it’s an interesting way to continue the civilization game. We’ve literally played through the Industrial Age level and it is just boring now. A post-transition game level would be new, fun, have lots of new gameplay.
Show this thread -
This is why I dislike “sustainability” frames. That’s just budgeting energy/matter to continue this level of the game indefinitely. It’s like if the only video games available were computerized board games. Sustainability is like computerizing chess. I’d like Tetris invented.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.