capitalism > communism bc basically runs itself. didn't need to be introduced through cataclysmic violence. gradually evolved out of political realities and common law vs. conceived as an ad hoc solution to the world at large by a resentful, egg-head, patronizing, false prophet.
Conversation
Replying to
Have you read Braudel or other early histories of capitalism? It's not quite that clean. In mercantilist pre-modern form it managed to bootstrap slavery and militarist colonialism without much of an ideological egghead air cover going.
2
1
4
Replying to
there's no "it". "it" does nothing, does not act. the strong subject the weak. the air cover was people pretending this was just or moral. more and more I think nobody ever believed that
1
Replying to
There is an it. Sorry, just because there is no subject that can be blamed doesn't mean there isn't a coherent complex system of mechanisms that exhibits emergent intentionality and has clear effects.
2
1
Replying to
I can't begin to think about effects because the data is all polluted. there's no meaningful control. Also we're, like, inside it.
1
Push come to shove, I'm probably a far more strident capitalist than you, but it has no real competitors anymore. Communism 2.0 etc is more history repeating itself as tragedy then as farce. Things like ancap aren't there yet. So we're in TINA zone.
1
The biggest threat to capitalism is actually its own past versions. The economic struggle now is between neoliberal globalism and protectionism, which are both flavors of capitalism.
1
Show replies
Replying to
my sense is the hard left is gaining, mostly due to despair. I'm an anti-marxist I guess, also sort of a recovering Marxist
1
Replying to
Nah, it's just some superficial rhyming. There are no Stalins lurking behind the pronoun warriors, anymore than there are Hitlers lurking behind the proudboys. It's all idiots larping behind scary historical masks.
1
Show replies

