That, as an ethnic Hindu, your moral framework has transcendental qualities, placing you beyond crude notions of good and evil.
-
-
-
Heh too parochial for my tastes, I like my self-serving cognition to be globalist in spirit
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Would you say you’re beyond this whole good and evil thing :P
-
Nah, never got there, so can’t get beyond. Got distracted with other stuff
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I’ll plead the 5th on that
End of conversation
-
-
-
Dualism conceptually can’t exist in the same place as mostly-ism. You invalidate their viewpoint, causing them pain, and segmenting yourself into their “bad” bucket.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Same reason they would find Robert Greene's work distasteful. Some people inherently mistrust the idea of taking a highly deliberate approach to life. Actively scheming in service of anything (even a goal that's ultimately beneficial to others) is frowned upon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the most self-serving way is probably to read their concept of a good person as being childish and incompatible with fearless cognitive growth, and since you are all about the fearless cognitive growth they naturally become uncomfortable with you, which they then justify somehow
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The disliking of the 'great' are the 'good'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
What is the most self-serving way I can interpret this?
I can’t judge if their self-assessments are accurate btw, since I can’t process good/evil above cartoon level