the most self-serving way is probably to read their concept of a good person as being childish and incompatible with fearless cognitive growth, and since you are all about the fearless cognitive growth they naturally become uncomfortable with you, which they then justify somehow
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
no useful feedback com this comment, but fwiw I think you are really allright and solid person.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Carts and horses might be an issue here. How do you know they think of themselves as good?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've gotten the most enjoyment and intellectual stimulation I find online via
@ribbonfarm for the last several years. I think anyone has a mix of good and evil potential. My vote puts you in the good camp.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The disliking of the 'great' are the 'good'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would you say you’re beyond this whole good and evil thing :P
-
Nah, never got there, so can’t get beyond. Got distracted with other stuff
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The most self-serving way to view it is that the self-perception of goodness presupposes arbitrary character judgements
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dualism conceptually can’t exist in the same place as mostly-ism. You invalidate their viewpoint, causing them pain, and segmenting yourself into their “bad” bucket.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
everyone answering the object-level question no one stopping to appreciate the masterful trollery of the question itself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
What is the most self-serving way I can interpret this?
I can’t judge if their self-assessments are accurate btw, since I can’t process good/evil above cartoon level