After reading this once I expected people to get extremely mad about it, because it’s so abstract with few big wordshttps://meaningness.com/metablog/artificial-intelligence-progress …
-
Show this thread
-
(except a single loanword that sounds extremely made-up)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Reading it again, it actually has a ton of big words hiding in it, but the weaponized clarity prevents you from noticing them
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
I’m still surprised people aren’t more mad about it though, it takes a dizzyingly abstract perspective on things we thought we knew about
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
I am entirely 100% unsurprised it isn't making anyone mad :D David is taking AI seriously in this post. It's mostly theater to the people who talk the most about. This is as relevant to the theater as astronomy is to astrology.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @vgr @sarahdoingthing
The ONLY time I ever recall astrologers getting mad at astronomers was when the latter decided to add a new constellation (Ophiucus) to the zodiac. It was like a gerrymandering debate :D
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes
Heh just did a search to be sure: he doesn't use the word 'singularity' even once in the post and paperclips only once in passing. Threat level 1/10.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.