it's very much normative rather than descriptive, and Hobbes was pretty clear that would have to whatever means they had at their disposal to cultivate it, bc people are pointedly *not* "naturally" Hobbesian subjects
Not at all. I’m familiar enough with those two to regard him as a serious synthesizer beyond them. You vastly underestimate the sheer amount of data the last century has provided. He’s primarily an interpreter of recent history more than of Hegel via Kojeve.
-
-
End of Hostory is an acknowledged Hegel exegesis, but his Origins of Political Order/Political Order Political Decay are definitely far beyond
-
hm... ok, yeah, to me Fukuyama is still synonymous with EoH and I haven't read Origins of Political Order (aha, 2011 -- that'd be why) so I'll concede it's entirely possible you're right and I'm wrong on this, full stop
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.