I’m sorry but “spiritual, but not religious” is the laziest kind of premium mediocre religious position.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Premium satire.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Okay, but what if I find atheist materialism to be insufficient and unimaginative but don’t subscribe to any religion either? There’s a no-man’s-land between Scientism and religion that’s begging to be named. The closest I’ve found is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ietsism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or it signifies that you have explored philosophy and mysticism from many angles and at once found reason to believe there's something there and no reason to believe any one explanation.
-
I've now settled on militant agnosticism. I don't know, and neither do you. These meat sacs are fundamentally incapable of processing the totality of existence, and are prone to all sorts of errors. Materialist atheism probably isn't totality, but it is at least fairly reliable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I oft say I am "religious, but not spiritual". "Religious" means I enjoy: * ceremonial feasts * contemplative practices * festive celebrations * some ancient ethical aphorisms "Not Spiritual" means: * Consider beliefs to be largely irrelevant to the above practices.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
counterpoint: are you sure it's not 90s retrocool at this point
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.