Conversation

Replying to
Semi related- we tend to assume that people we like have similar internal worlds to our own. The intellectual landscape of educated Indians is vastly different from that of educated Brits or Americans, I am starting to understand
1
Replying to
Well, I shouldn't overstate it. Strong Soviet influence for my generation, but main foreign influence is still British. We read Russian stuff in English translation. People like me think in English. Indian stuff runs on a different non-default VM with hypervisor switching.
1
Replying to
The contribution of english speaking Indians to modern British culture is important and subtle. For example - we all forgot about PG Wodehouse. There’s something special about your culture being fully grokked from a truly foreign perspective
1
Replying to
“Fully grokked” - at least as well as by European heritage folks like me, I think. Although if I say that too wholeheartedly I’m contradicting my whole “we don’t know what other people are thinking” thing. Tricky business this Twitter
2
Replying to
I think there's an important difference -- there's no ground truth to reference. For local brits, you've seen 1890s - 1920s world actually transform to modernity. For Indians, it's all books triangulating each other (PGW triangulates Christie/Doyle/Blyton...)
2
2
Replying to
Hmmm - I’m not sure I disagree - but if I did what I’d say is 1 my generation hasn’t seen anything before the 70s we see it all reflected through other people’s words 2 I don’t think humans are very good at remembering what things were like before - we all behave like things /1
1