From my perspective, your thinking often appears to stop two steps before the actual summit, and then take off in a different direction. That does not mean that this is objectively true, but perhaps that I measure the height of the reward landscape differently.
-
-
1. My description of your behavior did not contain its explanation and thus no understanding, even if it would have predictive value, and 2. divergence and convergence are not just there and need to be approved or not but are dynamics that exist for reasons we have to understand.
-
For instance, it is irrelevant in my mode of thinking that you think of yourself as a "divergentist". I am interested in the priors to that preference, because it is not terminal and may thus change. Your own response to that insinuates roughly that "divergence is natural".
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


