San Francisco is just the worst-case example, and Georgism/LVT just one fashionable solution, but everywhere you look, the root cause of a lot of economic malaise seems to be regressive land rights laws.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You sound Hayekian to me
-
I don’t think I am from what little I know. I’m pro fairly big government.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Q: What's the difference between a libertarian socialist and an anarcho-capitalist? A: Oh, about 6 figures.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Hope it doesn’t come to that kind of shitty reform path. This is close to the idea that the Black Death was “good” for Europe and the primary reason for the Renaissance. If that’s the only way put, the US is kinda screwed
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Hmmm. Not sure what to make of this. Private property's origin is landowners enclosing common space in England precisely at the time of the origin of capitalist social relations (EM Wood, "The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View" 1999)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
OK but let’s make some new national parks while we’re at it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There’s a fascinating interview on Econ Talk podcast recently with Glen Weyl that argues for a funky setup where most taxes are replaced by land use tax. Well worth a listen.
-
The key idea is that land users declare the value of the land themselves (and are taxed based on that) but others can buy it from them for the declared price.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.