Can you recommend an overview of everything wrong with probabilistic epistemology? I haven’t found one. There’s lots of papers that say “this particular objection is fatal, so why don’t you guys stop pretending,” but maybe no compendium of those?
-
-
Unfortunately this has become standard practice in many/most sciences. Result: replication crisis.
-
Philosophers of science and statisticians have both been pointing out for ~70 years that probability doesn’t work like that. But it’s too convenient for scientists to go on pretending.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.