Conversation

Replying to
I mean, those authors, who belong to my secondary university department, do a load of policy work, both at the UK and European levels. But they blend STS, evolutionary economics, energy transition studies, innovation management, etc.
2
1
Replying to and
I read whole piece - very abstract - and still had no clue if the overall collection was gonna be worth reading or not. Seemed dangerously possible it’d bend so far backwards to address gaps in mainstream tech futurism that it’d lose rigor. Say it ain’t so?
1
Replying to and
Maybe the collection has all this. Intro article seemed woolly on whether it was trying to offer plausible or preferred narratives. I’m all for thick futures (h/t ) but there’s a long history of missing the point with progressive takes on the topic.
1
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more