No that’s not quite right, but I doubt I can explain why clearly
dApps run on nodes is my understanding, but only a small subset of the code needs to live there
-
-
right, but it looks like (according to article) you still need to spend ether to commit to the main blockchain, meaning you need a separate monetization model for any dApps project https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.coindesk.com/zombiechain-comes-alive-can-ethereum-sidechains-save-dapps/amp/ …
-
Ethereum pay to play is, at least, far more reasonable than having your own separate blockchain. But I'd need to read up to make sure there's not a looming liquidity crisis on the horizon, like what Bitcoin hit recently...
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I can imagine ways to make that work (similar to how web apps can be written to do lots of client-side processing) but it seems like it would be hard to make secure. but anyway I'll stop speculating in a vacuum and read a bit. I've looked into the EVM before but don't get it yet
-
Yes there are weird hybrid architectures that do most computations offline then commit in batches etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.