an observable “epistemic effort” correlate of virtue signaling distinguishes it from virtue http://www.owl232.net/papers/passivity.htm …pic.twitter.com/a9ugfoYhLt
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Edit: not just intelligence, but energetic skepticism of everything. Just not worth questioning 90% of the time whether a low-cost ritual in particular is efficacious or not. If it is, you gain a lot. If not, you lose a little.
Basically I think this line of thought conflates intent to virtue signal from deep laziness social harmony compliance. There’s a behavioral regime you could call conventionalism that lies between conscious virtue signaling and empirically refined efficacious action.
Finally there’s value in installing a lower-cost cognitive norm even when it’s not locally meaningful. Is stopping at a 4-way when there are no other cars anywhere near the intersection a) virtue signaling b) internalized traffic cop superego c) “simpler rule” cognition hack?
d) good habit cultivationhttps://twitter.com/drethelin/status/996438636424986624 …
Re your q, traffic behavior may in fact be the example you’re looking for (low epistemic-effort for good). Most traffic rules are decent. Limited “no signage has lower accidents” experiments should be taken with huge grain of salt since they’re untested against long-term laziness
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.