rewatched the first two eps of mad men last night. was always crazy to me that some people thought it glamorized a bygone set of social mores. it’s so obviously bleak. straight-up macabre.
I think it does both. There’s no conflict. Glamor is always a bit macabre. The macabre is not always glamorous though.
-
-
"glamorous" as an aesthetic is different from "glamorizing" as an adjective. latter implies a condoning admiration. you're right that it has glamor though, and that that contributes to the macabre aspects of the show. alluring veneers, etc.
-
But the adjective does derive from a particular form of valorizing by aestheticizing. Death Becomes Her, Dorian Gray explore other corners of it. Also something something vampires. “Glamor” in true blood is literally a vampire movehttp://trueblood.wikia.com/wiki/Glamour
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.