I think we knew this (against quantum adversaries) already? Or maybe i'm actually thinking about a classical attack
-
-
-
Ah ok they made an earlier attack better. Ignoring t-gate depth optimization, if your choices are a 2K qubit adversary vs a 9K qubit adversary, just keep chugging to quantum-resistant options and keep your curves in the meantimepic.twitter.com/NbfhFcLLFN
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
TANSTAAFL... Claiming that 256 bit ECC was just as strong as 3072 bit RSA was always a joke.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Reduction of required qbits from 2.3k to 2.1k doesn’t make ECC insecure. This is why we have higher security levels. Note that AES needs less than 1k qbits with Grover of course.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Yup.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.