Good to know: revisiting the state of the art should be done more often. While at times saving crypto cycles is helpful & esp. when comparing to light weight crypto, note also that overall risk analysis must consider the "unknown unknowns" leading to "over-engineered security"!
-
-
-
of course; my point is that we know and understand enough to assign negligible probability to such risk, which I back with facts and history review in that paper; one can always object with unsubstantiated what-ifs
- Još 10 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Is it me, or your paper's point is that unbroken ciphers are unbroken? I certainly do you agree with that statement. Security margin is not decorative, it tries to avoid disasters. MD5/SHA1 disaster would have been partially avoided with a few more rounds.
-
looks like you have not read the paper, let alone understood it, won't explain it :)
- Još 18 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I wonder how the comments would be if you had a co-author from a three-lettered agency

-
ahah, if it were April 1st I'd have added "This paper was supported by a grant from and suggested by NSA"
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
1/ I will start with a small complaint - we have a 5-round attack on AES with time/data complexity of only 2^16 (see eprint 2019/1154).
-
Sorry if I forgot this, will add the reference!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Well done, I’m curious to see the reactions!
-
me too
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.