It's astonishing that Amy Coney Barrett isn't familiar with the law against intimidating voters at the polls ..
Someone who will serve a lifetime SCOTUS appointment should at the very least be familiar with the laws of this country
#NoConfirmationBeforeInauguration
-
-
-
I'm not surprised... This whole Trump adminstrative is full of people that are unqualified and not knowledgeable. In the real world for us folks, if we apply for a job and are not qualified we don't get hired.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Damn, that was just such an easy question
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Barrett has absolutely no idea what she's doing. She probably isn't even qualified to be a magistrate at all. Her lack of understanding of the law and the Constitution is shocking.
-
but even with zero knowledge, just the word "intimidation" sounds bad enough to any NORMAL person that believes in DEMOCRACY..
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The fact that Barrett wouldn't speak up to endorse the statute Klobuchar cited was shocking. Her dodging of issues is not subtle. It's pretty crude in fact. She's got her mind made up already. Good for Klobuchar for following the tracks.
-
Was she dodging or does she not know the law? Either way, not a good look.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
@amyklobuchar is bringing full on Minnesota nice to this hearing! Barrett wouldn't answer because she's heard 45's plans to break the law. -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
She wouldn't answer Klobuchar but is super chatty with Sasse right now. Hmm...
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.