A bit like eligible for pre-selection. Morrison was approximately that, wasn't he?
-
-
-
8 votes to 82. 8 slanders MP with 82 gets in. slander proven but too late for innocent 82. How great is a killer-instinct eh?
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
If eligibility is so important, can they explain why some eligible projects *didn't* get funded?
-
All projects are eligible, but some projects are more eligible than others.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I'm still confused then how projects submitted after the deadline and projects that didn't meet the minimum requirements were funded. "Eligible"?! The government engaging in a PR exercise is a cynical treatment of the electorate, and that doesn't bode well for democracy.
-
Or the ones who were ineligible once building works had commenced, but got funded anyway...
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Notice how he said they wouldn't be funding unsuccessful projects? They were only unsuccessful BECAUSE of the corrupted process.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
Mosman Rowers at the Spit =genuine need

#FederalICACNow#auspol#warringahvotedforHonestynowHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.