Valerie Halla

@valeriehalla

❤ Queer trans cartoonist drawing queer trans cartoons 💛 friendly comix 💙 I · iv · ♭VI+ · ♭VI♯11 · ♭VII · I ℹ️ She/her ℹ️ 日本語OK ⚠ Sometimes NSFW

Portland, OR
Joined October 2014

Tweets

You blocked @valeriehalla

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @valeriehalla

  1. Apr 13
    Undo
  2. Apr 13

    To me this is like football. This would be like when they throw the football through the football hoop

    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. Apr 13

    All I want for Christmas is for velvet worms to be extant members of the lobopod taxon. I just want that for them. Haven't they earned it???

    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. Apr 13

    They did so much research about lobopods while I wasn't looking!!!

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. Apr 11

    a planet like earth, but significantly hotter, sunnier, and wetter, i think, would maybe be the scariest place in the universe. a planet where creatures the size of a guy could afford to have the metabolism of a fly would be my personal nightmare

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. Apr 11

    one of the biggest factors in determining how scary an animal is is its energy budget. cave creatures and deep sea freakfish may look scary, but they're all bark and no bite. the amazon rainforest is one writhing mass of biting stinging animals that move faster than you can think

    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. Apr 10

    in some cases, like above, a clause beginning with "to which" ends (or would end) with a completely different preposition; sometimes the "to" is just superfluous: "[he looked] closely at convergence in evolution, to which he would call the robust replicability thesis"

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Apr 10

    it seems like it's maybe a hypercorrection against ending a sentence with a preposition (which is COMPLETELY NORMAL, BY THE WAY!!) where, failing to account for which preposition you would otherwise end the sentence with, you just stick "to" in there and forget about it

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. Apr 10

    a random example i heard recently: "he would even go on to write a book about his discoveries and hypotheses around them, to which he goes into greater detail on." like, WHOA, right??? like, WHOA???

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Apr 10

    this one actually fascinates me because i've heard it from at least a half dozen different narrators on as many completely unrelated channels. it explodes in my ears as ungrammatical, but clearly it doesn't in everyone's, because it's spreading fast

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Apr 10

    i haven't heard someone say "irregardless" in the past, like, decade. it's time for us to move on to a *real* problem: why does like every youtube video essayist in 2022 think "to which" is an all-purpose conjunction and determiner???

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Apr 9

    any ever build a town house out of red bricks with big white bricks on the corners only ? especially if the white bricks alternate directions and form a lil bouncy pattern. just an idea i had

    Undo
  13. Apr 7

    Five minute craft ideas for civilizations: making pottery? Try taking a length of rope or braided cord and pressing it into the wet clay. You can make all kinds of fun patterns!

    Undo
  14. Apr 7

    or like how the word "alphabet" refers one specific set of symbols (or used to, a long time ago), and is named after the first two symbols in that set (alpha, beta)! to say the whole set is redundant: alpha, beta, you know the rest. she, her, you know the rest!

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Apr 7

    so in other words, "he/him" isn't really MEANT to be an exhaustive description of a set of pronouns -- it's kind of just a descriptive term which *refers* to a set of pronouns, the way, like, "hearts suit" refers to a set of cards

    Show this thread
    Undo
  16. Apr 7

    you could simply say "i use he pronouns" (as some do!), or you could exhaustively say "i use they/them/their/theirs/themself" (as some also do!). but the former reads kind of awkwardly, and the latter is often redundant bc it's deducible from context (even for many neopronouns)

    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. Apr 7

    as a professional trans who is also a hobbyist linguist, i find it interesting that we all settled on "[nominative case of pronoun]/[oblique case of pronoun]" as our shorthand for specifying our pronouns (e.g. "my pronouns are she/her"). there's more cases than that!

    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Apr 7

    here's the thing about blue whales. they aren't even blue! they're just whale colored. "the blue whale is so named because underwater it can appear grayish blue" LIKE LITERALLY EVERYTHING ELSE UNDERWATER??? NOT NOTABLE, GUYS!!!!!!!!

    Undo
  19. Apr 6

    i have a somewhat heavy touch when drawing, but that's just because i like to take advantage of the full range of pressure sensitivity. if the nibs are gonna scratch shit up at pressures the pen is explicitly designed to handle, that's a problem!!!

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Apr 6

    the issue is that i just got a brand new screen protector, and these plastic nibs are already leaving rainbow scratches in it!! (this was also a problem with the protector it came with -- it got so scratched in just a few months that it was blurry to the point of unusability)

    Show this thread
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·