Well, well, well, well, well. It looks like antivaxer @delbigtree wants me to "debate" him on his podcast @HighWireTalk—a guy who recently appropriated the Yellow Star of David that the Nazis made Jews wear during the Holocaust to represent the "persecution" of antivaxers. 1/https://twitter.com/HighWireTalk/status/1115604823808696320 …
-
-
Name the credible journalist who was denied a conversation and by whom.
-
As an educated researching parent it's clear to me that
@delbigtree produces evidence-based arguments. Those who disagree in my experience name-call but don't reassure. Repeating vaccine messaging is not evidence. Qs around testing standards. Surveillance standards, etc
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Looks very weak" is messaging not science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Del BigTree has NO scientific NOR journalistic credentials. The closest he comes is being PRODUCER of TV medical shows (and antivax films) It's also relevant to point out that a common tactic by denialists is "just asking questions", even when evidence shows general consensus.
-
They are masters of sea lioning.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"A bloke who's a professor of dentistry for 40 years does not have a debate with some idiot who removes his teeth with string and a door".https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgikd1yIvgU …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any parent capable of actually parsing that won’t be fooled by Del’s clear and obvious bullshit. FYI.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s strange;
#AntiVax talking points are only messaging and zero science. So the “researching parent” should smell that a mile away.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.