body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email

This idiot

at

has ZERO idea of the definition of "evidence." There is nothing called "evolving evidence" - that means he has NO evidence. The DEFINITION of EVIDENCE according to REAL SCIENCE, is unambiguous predictions. If there is ambiguity, it is not evidence.

Quote Tweet

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus

Today @WHO has updated its guidance on who should wear a mask, when it should be worn and what it should be made of based on evolving evidence: bit.ly/3dCGAvP #COVID19

Show this thread

Embedded video

2:10

487.1K views

12:06 PM · Jun 6, 2020

Replying to

and

The WHO is a very untrustworthy organization. Way too many conflicts of interest to be taken seriously. There is no credible evidence that masks do anything to stop the spread of COVID-19.

1

Sub Pop Culture

Replying to

and

I know you have political ambitions but I’d rather see you replace

as the nations pop-culture scientist. You would teach folks the scientific method and it’s so important that we all learn it.

3

Replying to

Embedded video

0:27

764 views

2

10

@ThirdEyeView_11

Replying to

and

He is still in power peddling this narrative like a professional sleuth, & continuing to put lives at risk from non- scientific evidence. He is part of the racketeering pack that should be done from crimes against humanity.

6

Lord Mighty Humanzee

Replying to

Evidence is the end state, conjecture and weak clues are what you have in a mystery. Big difference as you state. Evolving evidence ~= Evidence based-management. Phraseology to bolster weak foundation because it sounds like you actually researched and divined the truth.

1

SerenitySeekingCH3

Replying to

and

The WHO and Antifa almost seem like they are the same thing? I wonder how that could be so ? lol

2

Nwabiafra Onyebiafran

Replying to

@ChukwudubemIgb1

WHO and UN are the same. They have caused a lot damage to humanity. They're there just for gossip. nothing else. Useless organisation!!!

3

Replying to

and

Did they or China create these guidance?

1