Would love to read it but no access! Will try to follow discussion here... Sounds interesting
-
-
-
Please e-mail me u.frith@ucl.ac.uk and I send the paper to you.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for writing this. Here's my take (as a PhD student) on the perils of fast science:https://socialsciences.nature.com/users/304226-robin-mazumder/posts/54558-risk-reward-and-diminishing-returns-reflections-on-the-publish-or-perish-paradigm …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would say the best way to do this would be to change the incentives--if editors and journals start of prioritize the quality of the evidence rather than the novelty, it will shift the value to slowing down and getting it right.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s a great article!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m in - great initiative from
@utafrithThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s a great idea. A slow movement for science
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Might be of interest to
@Meaningness@michael_nielsen@alexeyguzeyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"to restrict the number of papers anyone can publish per year. Personally, I would aim for just one. " An outstanding side effect is the destruction of the scientific publishing industry as we know it--finally.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was told that a good experiment takes a year to plan, a day to do and a day to analyze the results. Too fast?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.